Legal Opinion
Bauer v. Pounds
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 5, 2000No. AC 19136PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HEALEY, J.
The plaintiff, Carl R. Bauer, cross appeals from the judgment of tire trial court granting the motion to set aside the jury’s verdict filed by the defendant H.N.S. Management Company, Inc. (H.N.S.), doing business as Connecticut Transit, in this personal injury action.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly *31granted the motion because (1) it was based on factual and legal grounds different from those set forth in a previous motion H.N.S. had filed seeking a directed verdict, which was denied after the close of the plaintiffs case-in-chief, (2) it incorporated facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Patterson v. V & M Auto BodyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AvcollieSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Snowden v. Checkpoint Check CashingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Snowden v. Checkpoint Check CashingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Monti v. WenkertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.