Rise v. State of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
59 F.3d 1556
64 USLW 2115, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5535,
95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9438
Erik C. RISE; David R. Durham; Jeffery F. Rhodes; David
A. English; and Michael Milligan, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF OREGON; Fred Pearce; Director, Department of
Corrections; Department of State Police; Reginald B.
Madsen, Superintendent, Department of State Police;
Catherine Knox, Administrator, DOC Health Services
Department; and John Does 1-25, DOC employees implementing
Chapter 669, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-35521.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 2, 1994.
Decided July…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Roe v. MarcotteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Belgarde v. MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Landry v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
- Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Shaffer v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.