Roe v. Marcotte
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POOLER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, imprisoned upon their conviction of sexual offenses under Connecticut state law, challenge the constitutionality of Conn. Gen.Stat. § 54-102g, which, among other things, requires all convicted sexual offenders who were incarcerated on the statute’s effective date to submit a blood sample for analysis and inclusion in a DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) data bank. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Squatrito, J.) dismissing their challenges to the statute’s constitutionality. They argue that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.