Legal Opinion

Roe v. Marcotte

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 1999No. Docket No. 98-2790PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POOLER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, imprisoned upon their conviction of sexual offenses under Connecticut state law, challenge the constitutionality of Conn. Gen.Stat. § 54-102g, which, among other things, requires all convicted sexual offenders who were incarcerated on the statute’s effective date to submit a blood sample for analysis and inclusion in a DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) data bank. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Squatrito, J.) dismissing their challenges to the statute’s constitutionality. They argue that the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Thomas Cameron KincadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Kaemmerling v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Brandon Michael LifshitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API