Legal Opinion

United States v. Pennsylvania Railroad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-687PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSENBERG, District Judge.

This matter is submitted in the above entitled action on an Agreed Statement of Facts and Issues.

The Government, as plaintiff, filed a complaint setting forth five causes of action. The first two causes of action charged violations of 45 U.S.C. §§ 61-64, because of the defendant’s permitting an engineer and a fireman to remain on duty for a longer period than sixteen consecutive hours on March 11, 1966.

The next three causes of action charge violations of § 1 to § 10 of 45 U.S.C., and an order issued pursuant thereto by the Interstate Commerce Commission dated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
  3. United States v. PitcairnDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1938
  4. United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Temple v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API