Legal Opinion
United States v. Ingham
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 23, 1995No. 93-0868; CMR No. 9002347PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
1. Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer members in Kaiserslautern, Federal Republic of Germany. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of willfully disobeying an order from a superior commissioned officer and breaking arrest (2 specifications), in violation of Articles 90 and 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 890 and 895, respectively. Contrary to his pleas, appellant was also convicted of sodomy with a child under the age of 16 by force and without consent (3 specifications), committing indecent acts or liberties…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. DewrellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. WeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. BeatyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. HughesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. NdanyiCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.