Bowden v. Gabel
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff awarding relief under our usury statute, section 7727, Revised Codes. By agreement the cause was tried to the court without a jury.
The facts as disclosed by admissions in the pleadings, by undisputed evidence, or by that most favorable to plaintiff when in conflict, were these: Defendant Gabel loaned to the Barnett Iron & Machinery Company, a corporation, the sum of $4,500 on October 31, 1931. The machinery company, to evidence the indebtedness, executed and delivered to Gabel a promissory note in the sum of $5,000, payable…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Chakales v. DjiovanidesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- First National Bank v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Chandler v. CookeMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Grady v. PriceArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Arrowhead, Inc. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
- Wood v. SadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Bermes v. SyllingMontana Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.