Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Gabel

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1937No. 7,703PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff awarding relief under our usury statute, section 7727, Revised Codes. By agreement the cause was tried to the court without a jury.

The facts as disclosed by admissions in the pleadings, by undisputed evidence, or by that most favorable to plaintiff when in conflict, were these: Defendant Gabel loaned to the Barnett Iron & Machinery Company, a corporation, the sum of $4,500 on October 31, 1931. The machinery company, to evidence the indebtedness, executed and delivered to Gabel a promissory note in the sum of $5,000, payable…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Chakales v. DjiovanidesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. First National Bank v. ChildsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  5. Chandler v. CookeMississippi Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Grady v. PriceArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Arrowhead, Inc. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Wood v. SadlerIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bermes v. SyllingMontana Supreme Court · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API