State v. . Stevenson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtViNBOene, J.
We are of opinion that the alleged confession, having been made under the circumstances described by the officers, was involuntary and incompetent. The admission of it in evidence is error. S. v. Anderson, 208 N. C., 771, at 777 and 783; S. v. Myers, 202 N. C., 351, 162 S. E., 764; S. v. Livingston, 202 N. C., 809, 164 S. E., 337; S. v. Grier, 203 N. C., 586, 166 S. E., 595; S. v. Gosnell, 208 N. C., 401, 181 S. E., 323; S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421.
The factual situation here is very similar to that in S. v. Anderson, supra, where a new trial was granted the defendant Overman.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- State v. . GosnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PruittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.