Legal Opinion

State v. . Gosnell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1935PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

There was a motion to quash the bill of indictment on the alleged ground that the grand jury, which returned the true bill, was drawn by a jury commission not competent to act, and a nonresident of the county was allowed to serve on the grand jury. S. v. Wilcox, 104 N. C., 847, 10 S. E., 453. Upon a hearing, duly had, the facts were found against the defendants on their motion to quash and with respect to tbe legality of the grand jury. In this there was no error. The two rulings are directly supported by the decisions in S. v. Vick, 132 N. C., 995, 43 S. E., 626, and McCullers v.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1827
  3. State v. . SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. State v. . NewsomeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API