Legal Opinion

Leveque v. Paulson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1994No. 9109-05961; CA A75722PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this action for defamation, plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court denied his motion for partial summary judgment and granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff is a physician and defendant is an attorney. Defendant represented a third party, Greene, in an unsuccessful action to recover damages for injuries she allegedly received from being exposed to fumes from a broken gas heater. At trial in the injury case, plaintiff testified on Greene’s behalf as an expert witness. At the time of trial, the State Board…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Irwin v. AshurstOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. McKinney v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hulse v. Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
  2. Dauven v. StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. In re Adoption of the 2005 Revisions to the Oklahoma Uniform Jury Instructions—CriminalCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API