Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Cooper

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is an action to recover damages resulting from an alleged libel published of and concerning the plaintiff. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained on the ground that no cause of action was alleged. On refusal of the plaintiff to plead further, a judgment was entered dismissing the action. Plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff in his complaint alleges:

‘ ‘ That plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Lakeview, County of Lake, State of Oregon, and is now, and was, during all the times herein mentioned, a regularly licensed attorney at law in the State of Oregon, with offices in Lakeview, Oregon.

“…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Bussewitz v. Wisconsin Teachers' Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Cooper v. PhippsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Irwin v. AshurstOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Pitts v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Richeson v. KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Chard v. GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Grubb v. JOHNSONOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Franson v. RadichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API