Legal Opinion

Moores v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1995No. A068137PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

Appellants William M. and Tona E. Moores brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that they had an easement over property owned by respondent William D. Walsh. Following a court trial, judgment was entered in favor of respondent. We affirm.

I

Background

In 1993, appellants purchased a 40-acre parcel of unimproved land (the Moores parcel) in Mendocino County from the Regents of the University of California (The Regents), pursuant to a public bidding process, for the purpose of logging the timber on the property. Bid documents provided by The Regents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  3. State of Utah v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1979
  4. Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Carey v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Murphy v. BurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Malulani Group, Ltd. v. Kaupo Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Murphy v. BurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Scher v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API