Murphy v. Burch
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
68 Cal.Rptr.3d 200 (2007)
156 Cal.App.4th 1434
Cheryl MURPHY, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Roger BURCH, et al., Defendants and Appellants.
No. A117051.
Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Two.
November 19, 2007.
Petersen Law Offices, Thomas E. Owen, Robert C. Petersen, Fort Bragg, for Appellants.
Carter, Vannucci & Momsen, LLP, Jared G. Carter, for Respondent.
HAERLE, Acting P.J.
I. Introduction
Appellants Roger and Michele Burch appeal from a judgment of the Mendocino County Superior Court which held, on facts stipulated by the parties, that an easement by necessity existed across…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leo Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Reese v. BorghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Daywalt v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.