Legal Opinion

Kellogg v. Garcia

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 2002No. C037628PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KOLKEY, J.

Plaintiffs Theodore and Sylvia Kellogg (the Kelloggs) were gifted a landlocked parcel, which requires that they use a private road that crosses their neighbors’ properties in order to gain access to the property. Defendants Ronald and Judith Garcia (the Garcias) deny that the Kelloggs have a right to use the private road that traverses their property for purposes of such access. The Kelloggs sued to quiet title, claiming an implied or express easement over the Garcias’ and their other neighbors’ properties. Following trial, the trial court ruled in favor of the Garcias.

Under…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
  5. State of Utah v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Murphy v. BurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Beyer v. Tahoe Sands ResortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Visser v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. People Ex Rel. Brown v. Tehama County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API