Legal Opinion

Carey v. Rae

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,705PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the Superior Court of Sacramento County. Denson, J. The action was brought to quiet the title of the plaintiff to a right of way.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

Originally, the appellant MeKune and the respondent Rae were co-tenants with other tenants in common of the Moquelumne Ranch, situate in San Joaquin County. In an action of partition, between all the tenants in common of the ranch, a tract of land containing four hundred and five acres, known and designated on the partition map of the ranch as " Survey Mo. 55,” was allotted and set apart in severalty to appellant; and a tract containing two hundred and sixty-two and thirty-one one hundredths acres, known and designated on the same map as “ Survey Mo. 62,” was allotted and set apart…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New-York Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. MilnorNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Duff v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Waubun Beach Ass'n v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State ex rel. Carlson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API