Legal Opinion

Keilhamer v. West Coast Telephone Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1941No. 28034PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

Mary E. Keilhamer and her husband brought this action to recover for personal injuries which they alleged she sustained from a telephone receiver “through the defendant negligently causing or negligently permitting a severe shock, electric impulse or tremendous vibration to come into her ear, head and body. . . . ” A trial before a jury resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. Timely motions by the defendant for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict were severally denied. Defendant also moved for a new trial, but, when the motion came on for hearing, it was…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Michelbrink v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Hoffman v. Transworld Systems IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  3. Horman v. Sunbelt Rentals IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  4. Michael Michelbrink, Jr. v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API