Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 9, 1924No. 15300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Suit on a promissory note was brought by Armour Fertilizer Works against T. B. Kenney and the administratrix of the estate of J. C. Hudspeth. On demurrer the administratrix was dismissed as a party defendant, and the case proceeded against Kenney alone. He admitted a prima facie case and assumed the burden. The note sued on was signed, “ J. B. Kenney,” and “Est. J. C. Hudspeth, by J. 0. Bridges, executor,” and was given for fertilizer. In his answer Kenney alleged, in substance, that he was the tenant of Martha J. Hudspeth, who had a life estate in the land he rented; that she bought the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bethune v. DozierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  2. Toomer v. DickersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  3. Jones v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
  4. Cloud v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  5. Mason & Dickinson v. CroomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armour Fertilizer Works v. KenneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Company v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Kenney v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API