Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 4, 1926No. 15300Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

The facts will be found in the original opinion in this case, 33 Ga. App. 126.

In the brief of plaintiff in error is the following: “The controlling question before this court for determination is: Was the defendant surety under the uncontroverted facts wholly 'discharged’ from liability on the note by reason of plaintiff’s breach of its contractual duty to keep the cotton insured, or merely 'relieved’ pro tanto of his obligation to pay to the same extent as would be his principal were she a party to the suit?” This court held that under the pleadings and the evidence the surety was relieved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conley v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Armour Fertilizer Works v. KenneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Kenney v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API