W. T. Rawleigh Company v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
In the outset we might say that the overruling of the demurrer of the plaintiff to the defendants’ amended answer was not error. The answer as amended set up a good defense. The next question, then, is whether the evidence supports such a plea. The evidence, without dispute, shows that Mrs. J. M. Moore never signed the contract as surety, and that so far as the evidence reveals, she never authorized anyone to sign it for her, and that she did not even know it during her lifetime. The evidence is also undisputed that the agent for the plaintiff who procured the contract represented to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- W. T. Rawleigh Company v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Cloud v. ScarboroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Loyless v. Hesse Envelope & Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Armour Fertilizer Works v. KenneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Lynchburg Shoe Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Potomac Leasing Co. v. ThrasherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Bank of Terrell v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- National Old Line Insurance v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Frederick D. Harris and Bernice R. HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
- Hassell v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF NEWTON CTYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.