Legal Opinion
Marrs v. Marriott Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 21, 1992No. Civ. A. WN-91-1921PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NICKERSON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Paper No. 16). Plaintiff has filed an Opposition (Paper No. 20) 1 and Defendants have replied (Paper No. 22). Upon a review of the motion and the applicable caselaw, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary (Local Rule 105.6) and that Defendants’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
/. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of the termination of Plaintiff Timothy H. Marrs [“Marrs”] from his position as a security guard for Defendant Marriott Corporation [“Marriott”]. Marrs was…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Woodbury v. Victory Van LinesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
- Sanders v. American Broadcasting CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Miller v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Conner v. City of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.