Legal Opinion
Woodbury v. Victory Van Lines
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 21, 2017No. Civil Action No. TDC–16–2532PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Shera Woodbury, who is self-represented, has brought this action against her former employer, Victory Van Lines ("Victory"), owned by Great Nation Moving, LLC ("Great Nation"), and Great Nation's principal owner, Sherif Yanuzov,1 *690alleging that she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of sex, national origin, and disability in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12112 to 12117. Woodbury also…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Alaameri v. Secretary of the Department of Public Safety and Correctional ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Allison Theys, et al. v. Dental Intelligence, Inc., et al.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
- Anderson v. DHHS/Central Regional HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Anna Rudolph v. Tongue & Groove, LLC; Tongue & Groove Realty, LLC; and Mark BatsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Arif v. Maryland Department of State PoliceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.