Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Neiman-Marcus Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1926No. 656-4529PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.
' This case is stated fully by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 277 S. W. 201. Briefly stated, it was a suit instituted by defendant in error in the district court of Dallas county, seeking recovery of $2,562.46 alleged to be due it by plaintiff in error by reason of a bond the latter had issued for defalcations of credit manager of defendant in error., The district court rendered judgment as sued for, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that judgment.
During the two annual periods of said bond from December 13, 1918, to December 13, 1920, the embezzlements of the credit manager amounted to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Delaware Underwriters & Westchester Fire Insurance v. BrockTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Burns v. American Nat. Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Ballard County Bank's Assignee v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Proctor Coal Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WannTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Chicora Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Terry v. Water Improvement Dist. No. 5Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.