Legal Opinion

Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye Works

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1935No. 1476PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Dallas Steam Laundry Dye Works instituted this suit against the Massachusetts Bonding Insurance Company to recover pecuniary losses sustained by reason of alleged theft and embezzlement of Wade T. Reynolds, an employee of the laundry company. The defendant denied liability. The trial was before the court and jury, and upon answers to special issues, a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for the amount sued for. The bonding company appeals. There is no regular statement of facts, but the points presented are predicated upon the bond and certain agreed stipulations. The parties will be…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. American Surety Company v. PaulySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Ruddock v. Detroit Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. FellbaumTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  5. McCoy v. Northwestern Mutual Relief Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Southland Life Insurance v. VelaTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  3. The Travelers Indemnity Company v. B. N. Holman, Mary Alice CoombsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  4. Jones v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API