Legal Opinion

Proctor Coal Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1903PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is a suit by the plaintiff against the defendant on a fidelity insurance bond. The original declaration was demurred to, when amendments were filed by the plaintiff, to which amendments demurrers have also been filed. On December I, 1898, the defendant company entered into a contract with the plaintiff company, by which it insured the plaintiff against loss by reason of any act of fraud or dishonesty on the part of one C. H. Stanton. The Proctor Coal Company had its office at Knoxville, Tenn., and Stanton had charge of its business at Atlanta, Ga. The bond was in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeJernette v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. Mayor of Brunswick v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. Dallas Steam Laundry & Dye WorksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Brulatour v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Fourth & First Bank & Trust Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commercial State Bank of RantoulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1926
  5. Green v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API