Legal Opinion

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Record

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1944No. 10885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The case out of which this appeal grows, though tried at a different time and to a different jury, was tried by the same judge, in substantially the same way, and on substantially the same general charge, as Ochsner’s case,1 this day decided. The verdict as in Ochsner’s case, was based not on the market value of the gas at the well but on evidence having no relation thereto. Unless, then, there are differences between this case and that, which require a different result, the judgment in this case must, for the reasons given there, be reversed and the cause remanded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kretni Development Co. v. Consolidated Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Danciger Oil & Refineries, Inc. v. Hamill Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. OchsnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. West v. Alpar Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. Piney Woods Country Life School v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1982
  5. Texas Oil & Gas Corporation v. VelaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API