Legal Opinion
Hoard v. U. S. Paint, Lacquer & Chemical Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam G. Easton, J.
Defendant, a nondomiciliary corporation, moves to dismiss the action on the ground that no valid service of process has been made upon it. A summons with notice was served upon the defendant in the State of Missouri. The plaintiff is a resident of the State of New York. The defendant has no offices for the doing of business in the State of New York, nor is it authorized to do business therein. It has no agents in the State of New York and maintains no offices, show*73rooms, warehouses or bank accounts therein. It owns no property in the State of New York.
The action is one for “recision and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Irgang v. Pelton & Crane Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Jump v. Duplex Fending Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Case v. HardenbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Unger v. Eagle Fish Co.New York Supreme Court · 1945
- Unger v. Eagle Fish Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paul I. Murphy v. Erwin-Wasey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- Trafalgar Capital Corp. v. Oil Producers Equipment Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Carrington v. SchuttsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Stanat Manufacturing Co. v. Imperial Metal Finishing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York City Family Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.