Legal Opinion

Rowland v. Superintendents of the Poor

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.

The practice adopted in this case is one not to be commended or encouraged. The defendants pleaded the general issue, and upon the trial objected to any and all evidence being received under the declaration, assigning various reasons therefor, which, if well founded, should have been raised .by demurring to the declaration, thus saving all unnecessary trouble and expense. We do not say that an objection going to the whole merits of the case or cause of action stated in the declaration may not be raised in this way, but when it is, the position taken must be very clear — so clear, indeed, that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. City of Port HuronMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Stoflet v. MarkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Aldrich v. ChubbMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Brown v. McHughMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gunther v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Richards v. Birmingham School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Kilts v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Foss v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API