Legal Opinion

Brown v. McHugh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to St. Clair Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

*Gra.vbs, J.:

Brown brought assumpsit against McHugh and declared upon the common counts. The count for money paid had a clerical inaccuracy. Instead of stating that the money was paid to the defendant’s use, it stated that it was piaid to the defendant. Without questioning the sufficiency of the declaration in this or in any other respect by demurrer, McHugh pleaded the general issue and went to trial on the issue of fact. Brown gave evidence tending to show that in September, 1874, he bought a pair of horses of defendant and paid him for them and that defendant represented that they were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Raborg v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  2. Young v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
  3. Olcott v. RathboneNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Lovell v. EvertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1814
  5. Rockfeller v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Port Huron & Southwestern Railway Co. v. PotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Reading v. BeardsleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Gilbert v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API