Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Chubb

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Case made from Superior court of Grand Rapids.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, J.:

Worthington, Meek & Cheeney, a firm of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on January 24, 1874, made their promissory note for four hundred dollars and interest at ten per cent., on three months’ time, payable to Chubb’s order, and Aldrich, claiming that Chubb negotiated the note to him, and guaranteed its collection, and had become fixed with liability, brought this suit in the superior court of Grand Rapids to enforce the guaranty. He averred the making of the note by Worthington, Meek & Cheeney, its negotiation and endorsement over by Chubb to him, and Chubb’s contract of guaranty. He then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Craig v. . ParkisNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Day v. ElmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Downs v. HawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  4. Jennison v. HaireMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Hatheway v. SackettMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Superintendents of the PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Clark v. FieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Clark v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Gilbert v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API