Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ausfahl v. Caldara

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 30, 2006No. 06SA41Published

1DissentJustice Coats

Once again the majority deprives the voters of an opportunity to express themselves on a proposal to limit public fundraising. And once again its action is premised on some variation of the theme that public fund-raising by taxation and public fundraising by borrowing are separate subjects, unable to be considered by the voters in a single initiative. Because I can find no principled basis for treating the identical limitation on taxation and public indebtedness presented here as different subjects, I would not extend our prior reliance on this distinction to the particulars of the current…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Catron v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Jones v. PolhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Romer on House Bill No. 1353Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. Steadman v. HindmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API