Ausfahl v. Caldara
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Coats
Once again the majority deprives the voters of an opportunity to express themselves on a proposal to limit public fundraising. And once again its action is premised on some variation of the theme that public fund-raising by taxation and public fundraising by borrowing are separate subjects, unable to be considered by the voters in a single initiative. Because I can find no principled basis for treating the identical limitation on taxation and public indebtedness presented here as different subjects, I would not extend our prior reliance on this distinction to the particulars of the current…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Catron v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Jones v. PolhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Romer on House Bill No. 1353Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Steadman v. HindmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.