Legal Opinion
Steadman v. Hindman
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 24, 2000No. 99SA368PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs
This is an original proceeding brought pursuant to section 1-40-107(2), 1 C.R.S. (1999). Petitioner M. Patrick Steadman (Steadman), a registered Colorado elector, challenges the action of the Title Setting Board (Title Board) in adopting a title, ballot title, submission clause, and summary (titles and summary) for proposed ballot initiative 1999— 2000 #200A (Initiative #200A).1 Initiative #200A requires a woman’s “voluntary and informed consent” before a physician may perform an abortion. Its implementation terms include the delivery of prescribed information to women concerning the abortion…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- H. L. v. MathesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 25 v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jones v. PolhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Garcia v. MonteroSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Gonzalez-Estay v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 227 and 228 v. HobbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- In Re Ballot Title 1999-2000 No. 258 (A)Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.