Legal Opinion

In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Romer on House Bill No. 1353

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 11, 1987No. 87SA195PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

The Governor of the State of Colorado has submitted an interrogatory to this court asking us to decide whether House Bill No. 1353, enacted by the Fifty-Sixth General Assembly, violates the first clause of Article V, Section 21, of the Colorado Constitution, which provides that no bill, except general appropriation bills, shall be passed containing more than one subject. 1 We conclude that House Bill No. 1353 contains more than one subject in violation of that requirement and therefore is unconstitutional.

Article VI, Section 3, of the Colorado Constitution includes the provision that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lamm v. BarberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  2. In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. Goldberg v. MusimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Catron v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. MangumWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Vail Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 25 v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Aisenberg v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API