Legal Opinion

In re Breene

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1890PublishedCited by 69 opinions

Original Proceeding. Petition by Peter W. Breene for a writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

The right to inquire by habeas corpus into the matters presented in this case is not seriously challenged by respondents. Therefore, though counsel for petitioner consider the question at length, jurisdiction in the premises will be assumed without discussion.

The indictment under which petitioner is held in custody charges him with lending public moneys for private gain while occupying the office of state treasurer. He is not accused of otherwise' misappropriating or misusing state funds, nor is any deficit or defalcation in connection therewith averred. The accusation is based upon the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Golden Canal Co. v. BrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  4. Edwards v. Denver & R. G. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  5. Clare v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Parrish v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 25 v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. MaxSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Aisenberg v. CampbellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. Goldberg v. MusimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API