Legal Opinion
Rappaport v. City of Lawrence
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 3, 1941PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of contract to recover wages, alleged to be due the plaintiff for services rendered by him to the defendant. The judge found for the plaintiff, and the case comes before us on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of its requests for rulings.
The evidence tended to show the following facts. The plaintiff is a civil service employee of the defendant with a rating as "Supervisor Instructor — Caretaker” of swimming pools. Prior to September 5, 1935, he had been a "permanent recurrent” employee of the defendant under the designation of “Instructor — Caretaker.” On the date…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Callahan v. City of WoburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- McHenry v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Barnard v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Goodale v. County Commissioners of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rock v. City of PittsfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Gorman v. City of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Allen v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- James v. Mayor of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Seney v. Board of HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.