Legal Opinion
Callahan v. City of Woburn
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 19, 1940PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
These forty-one actions of contract to recover salaries or wages of employees, alleged to be due from the defendant city for the last part of 1938, were tried by a judge of the Superior Court sitting without jury. The declarations in two of the actions contain several counts in which the plaintiff Ring seeks to recover not only the salary alleged to be due him, but also salaries alleged to be due to others who have assigned their claims to him. No issue is raised as to the validity of these assignments, and the assignors, together with the other plaintiffs, will hereinafter be referred to as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Leonard v. School Committee of the City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- School Committee of the City of Lowell v. Mayor of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Decatur v. Auditor of PeabodyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Frye v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Paquette v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cobb v. City of MaldenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Kerrigan v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Boston Teachers Union v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.