Legal Opinion

Parker v. Wells

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1903No. 12,662PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duffie, C.

Plaintiff in error is administrator of the estate of John E. Haas, who departed this life June 28, 1896. Among other effects of the deceased, the administrator came into possession of a note made by the defendants in error for the snm of $118, drawing interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum} upon which this action was brought.

The answer alleges payment, and sets out four different items of work and labor performed, for the deceased in his lifetime at an agreed price, and which, it is alleged, he agreed to credit upon the note; also one cash payment of $25.

The case was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Butler v. FitzgeraldNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Wylie v. CharltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trute v. HoldenNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Dallas Dome Wyoming Oil Fields Co. v. BrooderWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  3. O'Neal v. First Trust Company of YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Dowding v. DowdingNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Tighe v. LinesNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API