Legal Opinion

Chase National Bank v. Healy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 6, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note, a renewal of one of like amount, signed by the defendant and payable to the order of the Manchester Manufacturing Company, and indorsed by that company while current to the Equitable Trust Company óf New York, as a part of the collateral security for a loan from the Trust Company to it. The Equitable Trust Company merged with the Chase National Bank, which became the holder of the note subject to the ownership rights of the Trust Company. At the close of all the evidence the trial court directed a verdict for" the-plaintiff, and the case is before us…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Howard National Bank v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Harponola Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  3. Grapes v. WilloughbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Whitman v. DaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Breding v. Champlain Marine & Realty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Valenti v. Imperial Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Scampini Et Ux. v. RizziSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  5. United States v. CapenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API