Legal Opinion

State v. Bourget-Goddard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 1999No. 9760694; CA A102745PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

The state appeals an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of a traffic stop on the ground that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to stop defendant for a traffic infraction. We reverse and remand.

The relevant facts are not in dispute. Officers Testa and Edwards saw defendant driving a 1977 Chevy Nova with a passenger in the front seat. The officers saw that the vehicle had shoulder belts and that neither defendant nor the passenger appeared to be wearing them. Specifically, the officers noticed that the straps appeared to be hanging down…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. EsplinOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. GilmourCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. State v. SpruillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Miller v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. IsleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. State v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API