Legal Opinion
Jett v. Ford Motor Company
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 11, 2004No. 9801-00538; A111123PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Jett v. Ford Motor Co., 335 Or 493, 72 P3d 71 (2003). Plaintiff Trudy Jett 1 initiated the action against defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford), claiming that a delivery truck manufactured by Ford that she drove as an employee of United Parcel Service (UPS) was defective and injured her as a result of that defect. Ford countered that plaintiffs injuries were the result of her own negligence. A jury found for plaintiff, apportioning 85 percent of the fault to Ford and the remaining 15 percent to plaintiff. Ford appealed, assigning…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hernandez v. Barbo MacHinery Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Sandford v. Chevrolet Division of General MotorsOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Johnson v. Clark Equipment CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Grillo v. Burke's Paint Company, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- In Re the Marriage of KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Maas v. WillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Ossanna v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Dosanjh v. Namaste Indian Restaurant, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.