Legal Opinion
Liddell v. Middlesex Motor Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 15, 1931PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries to the plaintiff, a boy five years of age, caused by an automobile driven by Louise Fee, on a public way in Cambridge on March 9, 1927. At the conclusion of the evidence counsel entered into a stipulation that the' judge would submit to the jury the issues of due care and damages, and if the jury found that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care and assessed damages, the judge would direct a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum found by the jury and report the case to the Supreme Judicial Court upon the terms that if on the competent…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- White v. E. T. Slattery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Chase v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Crompton v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Tripp v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robinson v. Trustees of the New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Liddell v. Standard Accident InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Di Cecca v. BucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Kenner v. Century Indemnity Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Caccavo v. KearneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.