Legal Opinion
Di Cecca v. Bucci
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 28, 1931PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtField, J.
This is an action of tort brought in the District Court by the owner of an automobile to recover compensation for damage resulting from its being struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. *16There was evidence that the plaintiff’s automobile was stopped beside the road, that some of the occupants had gone to get gasoline, and that while the automobile was so stopped the defendant’s automobile ran into the rear of it. It was admitted that there was evidence of the defendant’s negligence. The defendant, however, contends that recovery is barred by the fact that the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Nash v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Jenkins v. North Shore Dye House, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- McDonald v. DundonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Bacon v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cahill's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Simpson v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Doyle v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Topf v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Munson v. Bay State Dredging & Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.