Legal Opinion

Burgess Battery Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 20, 1959No. C.D. 2125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollisox, Judge:

The merchandise here involved is described on the invoice as “carbon cloth” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 23 cents per pound and 19 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1539(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for — ■

Manufactures wholly or in chief value of * * * any * * * product of which any synthetic resin or resin-like substance is the chief binding agent.

At the trial of the issue, it was conceded by counsel for the defendant that if the court should find the foregoing classification to be incorrect, the correct classification…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davies v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. H. W. Robinson Air Freight Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Wm. A. Hausman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. Rune Nicklasson, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API