Legal Opinion

Alltransport, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 11, 1960No. 64154; protests 260355-K, etc. (New York)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The three protests enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, relate to merchandise variously described on the invoices as “plastic Slide Binders ‘Lindia,’ ” or “ ‘Lindia’ plastic mounts,” or “ ‘Lindia’ frames for slides.” Although the merchandise is identical in all of the protests, the collector applied a different classification in each. In protest 260355-K, the merchandise was classified by similitude as cellulose acetate articles under paragraph 31(a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, and paragraph 1559 of the Tariff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. CochranCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. Burgess Battery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API