Legal Opinion

Hammond v. McMurray Brothers

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1930No. 5098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarian, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners in fee of 256.83 acres of unfenced land in sections 30 and 31, and 320 acres, fenced, in section 28 (upon which they reside), and are in possession and entitled to the possession of 320 acres in sections 20 and 21, under filings made pursuant to the Stock Raising Homestead Act (39 Stats. 862, 43 U. S. C. A., sec. 291 et seep), all in township 11, south of range 21, east of the Boise meridian, in Cassia county, Idaho. There is a large acreage of unoccupied government land in the vicinity of plaintiffs’ holdings, as well as land in possession of third persons.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cosfriff Bros. v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Unfried v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Henderson v. ColemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Herrin v. SiebenMontana Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Siebrand Bros. Circus & Carnival Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Lundy v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Boulton v. TelferIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Baggett v. PaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API