Legal Opinion
Gemme v. Goldberg
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 1993No. 11334; 11335PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants each appeal from a judgment rendered on a verdict against the defendant Herbert G. Schreiber awarding the plaintiff $50,000 and against the defendant Morton H. Goldberg awarding the plaintiff $200,000, reduced by 25 percent on account of the plaintiffs own negligence, for a net verdict against Goldberg of $150,000. The action is claimed to have had its genesis in the failure of both defendants to obtain the plaintiffs informed consent to treatments rendered to her by each of them individually.
*529The defendant Schreiber claims that the trial court improperly (1) permitted the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hall v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Coelho v. Posi-Seal International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rosick v. Equipment Maintenance & Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. ReckertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Caron v. AdamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Coble v. MaloneyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.