Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Watkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 1967No. Civ. 23333PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Plaintiffs sought to enjoin defendants’ use of a country roadway traversing plaintiffs’ land. Defendants cross-complained to enjoin plaintiffs’ construction of any barriers across said roadway. The trial court granted the relief sought by plaintiffs and defendants appeal.

In 1962 defendants entered into possession of a 1200-acre parcel of land in Humboldt County. The south fork of the Eel River courses through this parcel in a northeast to southwest direction. Approximately 300 acres lie south of the river. Since 1939, plaintiffs have been the owners of a 30-acre parcel south of the river and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Safway Steel Products, Inc. v. LefeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Crestline Mobile Homes Manufacturing Co. v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Cushing - Wetmore Co. v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Leverone v. WeakleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Hurwitz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. City of Berkeley v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Hazel Green Ranch, LLC v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API