Legal Opinion
Hurwitz v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1979No. Civ. 21261PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
The workers’ compensation judge determined that the claim of applicant Patricia M. Esposito was barred by the statute of limitations. After granting reconsideration, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) held that the employer, Michael Hurwitz, and his workers’ compensation insurance carrier, Industrial Indemnity Company, were estopped to assert the statute of limitations and remanded the case for further proceedings at the trial level. The employer and its insurance carrier (collectively, defendants) unsuccessfully petitioned for reconsideration and thereafter…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kaiser Foundation Hospitals v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Mission Ins. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- City of Santa Ana v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Maples v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.