Legal Opinion
Anthony v. Natalbany Lumber Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1939No. 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LE BLANC, Judge.
This is a suit for compensation in which the plaintiff, in order to bring his demand within the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Statute of this State and particularly Section 6 of the amending Act No. 85 of 1926 (page 113), alleged in his petition that the defendant who is engaged in all phases of the lumber business including the cutting, loading and hauling of logs, in furtherance of their said business “employed one Steve Anthony to purchase, cut and haul lumber (sic) belonging to defendant to defendant’s mill,” and that the said Steve Anthony, “in accordance with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whitley v. Hillyer-Deutsch-Edwards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Windham v. Newport Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- West v. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Brasher v. Industrial Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
- Miller v. Brenner Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1928
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. Crossett Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Taylor v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Hobbs-Western Company v. CraigSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Hatch v. Industrial Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
- Nelson v. SlayMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.