Legal Opinion

State v. Briggs

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 11, 2002No. 2000-464PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendants, Daniel Briggs, Dana Briggs and Bradley Briggs, appeal their convictions in Auburn District Court {LeFrancois, J.) on charges of obstructing government administration. See RSA 642:1 (1996). We affirm.

The following facts are supported by the record. On September 14,1999, James McKenzie, an officer of the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, was on duty “shining” fields by illuminating them with a hand-held light to check for deer or illegal activity. With him was a civilian friend named Charlie Johnson, who testified that he rode along “to check out the duties that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. WongSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  2. State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. State v. PikeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. State v. HaasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  5. State v. CortSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrobstSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. In re Juvenile 2003-187Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. State v. GaffneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API