Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Oil Works Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1931No. 22656, 22657 and 22658PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

(Kinkade, J.).

These three cases present like issues and will be covered in a single opinion.. The parties will be referred to as they stood in the trial court.

The plaintiffs respectively own and operate gasoline filling stations in the city of Cincinnati. The city, by an ordinance duly adopted, undertook to levy and collect an excise or occupational tax of $100 per annum against each of the plaintiffs. The payment of the tax was refused, and the plaintiffs brought these actions in the court of common pleas, seeking an injunction from that court restraining the city from collecting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Cincinnati v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Firestone v. City of CambridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Foundry Co. v. LandesOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haefner v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. East Ohio Gas Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Stuttgart Rice Mill Co. v. CrandallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Hickok Oil Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Hickok Oil Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API