Legal Opinion

Hickok Oil Corp. v. Evatt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1943No. 29417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

Appellant, a dealer in motor vehicle fuel and liquid fuel, contends that the Ohio motor vehicle fuel excise tax, the Ohio liquid fuel excise tax, the Michigan gasoline tax and the Ontario gasoline tax which remain in its hands at the end of its fiscal year should not be treated as taxes or assessments under Section 5327, General Code, but should be held to be current accounts payable and, therefore, deductible by appellant from its accounts receivable and prepaid items in making its return for taxation.

Section 5327, General Code, provides:

“Tlie term ‘credits’ as so used, means tlie excess of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Black-Clawson Co. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tax Commission v. National Malleable Castings Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Arneson v. W. H. Barber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. City of Cincinnati v. Cincinnati Oil Works Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beaver Excavating Co. v. TestaOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Scott v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Eide v. HottmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Red Top Brewing Co. v. PeckOhio Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API